Cont’d
Feb 06, 2025
HW 02 due Thursday, February 13 at 11:59pm
Lecture recordings available until start of exam, February 18 at 10:05am
Statistics experience due Tuesday, April 22
Understand statistical inference in the context of regression
Describe the assumptions for regression
Understand connection between distribution of residuals and inferential procedures
Conduct inference on a single coefficient
Today’s data come from Equity in Athletics Data Analysis and includes information about sports expenditures and revenues for colleges and universities in the United States. This data set was featured in a March 2022 Tidy Tuesday.
We will focus on the 2019 - 2020 season expenditures on football for institutions in the NCAA - Division 1 FBS. The variables are :
total_exp_m
: Total expenditures on football in the 2019 - 2020 academic year (in millions USD)
enrollment_th
: Total student enrollment in the 2019 - 2020 academic year (in thousands)
type
: institution type (Public or Private)
exp_fit <- lm(total_exp_m ~ enrollment_th + type, data = football)
tidy(exp_fit) |>
kable(digits = 3)
term | estimate | std.error | statistic | p.value |
---|---|---|---|---|
(Intercept) | 19.332 | 2.984 | 6.478 | 0 |
enrollment_th | 0.780 | 0.110 | 7.074 | 0 |
typePublic | -13.226 | 3.153 | -4.195 | 0 |
For every additional 1,000 students, we expect an institution’s total expenditures on football to increase by $780,000, on average, holding institution type constant.
For every additional 1,000 students, we expect an institution’s total expenditures on football to increase by $780,000, on average, holding institution type constant.
Statistical inference provides methods and tools so we can use the single observed sample to make valid statements (inferences) about the population it comes from
For our inferences to be valid, the sample should be representative (ideally random) of the population we’re interested in
such that the errors are independent and normally distributed.
Image source: Introduction to the Practice of Statistics (5th ed)
Suppose
A linear transformation of
Explain why
Once we fit the model, we can use the residuals to estimate
The estimated value
We often want to conduct inference on individual model coefficients
Hypothesis test: Is there a linear relationship between the response and
Confidence interval: What is a plausible range of values
But first we need to understand the distribution of
A sampling distribution is the probability distribution of a statistic for a large number of random samples of size
The sampling distribution of
The estimated coefficients
Show
Will show
Let
X <- model.matrix(total_exp_m ~ enrollment_th + type,
data = football)
sigma_sq <- glance(exp_fit)$sigma^2
var_beta <- sigma_sq * solve(t(X) %*% X)
var_beta
(Intercept) enrollment_th typePublic
(Intercept) 8.9054556 -0.13323338 -6.0899556
enrollment_th -0.1332334 0.01216984 -0.1239408
typePublic -6.0899556 -0.12394079 9.9388370
term | estimate | std.error | statistic | p.value |
---|---|---|---|---|
(Intercept) | 19.332 | 2.984 | 6.478 | 0 |
enrollment_th | 0.780 | 0.110 | 7.074 | 0 |
typePublic | -13.226 | 3.153 | -4.195 | 0 |
We will generally test the hypotheses:
State these hypotheses in words.
Test statistic: Number of standard errors the estimate is away from the null
If
In general,
The test statistic
We need to account for the additional variability introduced by calculating
Figure 1: Standard normal vs. t distributions
The p-value is the probability of observing a test statistic at least as extreme (in the direction of the alternative hypothesis) from the null value as the one observed
calculated from a
Why do we take into account “extreme” on both the high and low ends?
Magnitude of p-value | Interpretation |
---|---|
p-value < 0.01 | strong evidence against |
0.01 < p-value < 0.05 | moderate evidence against |
0.05 < p-value < 0.1 | weak evidence against |
p-value > 0.1 | effectively no evidence against |
These are general guidelines. The strength of evidence depends on the context of the problem.
There are two parts to the conclusion
Make a conclusion by comparing the p-value to a predetermined decision-making threshold called the significance level (
If
If
State the conclusion in the context of the data
A plausible range of values for a population parameter is called a confidence interval
Using only a single point estimate is like fishing in a murky lake with a spear, and using a confidence interval is like fishing with a net
We can throw a spear where we saw a fish but we will probably miss, if we toss a net in that area, we have a good chance of catching the fish
Similarly, if we report a point estimate, we probably will not hit the exact population parameter, but if we report a range of plausible values we have a good shot at capturing the parameter
We will construct
where
term | estimate | std.error | statistic | p.value |
---|---|---|---|---|
(Intercept) | 19.332 | 2.984 | 6.478 | 0 |
enrollment_th | 0.780 | 0.110 | 7.074 | 0 |
typePublic | -13.226 | 3.153 | -4.195 | 0 |
term | estimate | std.error | statistic | p.value | conf.low | conf.high |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Intercept) | 19.332 | 2.984 | 6.478 | 0 | 13.426 | 25.239 |
enrollment_th | 0.780 | 0.110 | 7.074 | 0 | 0.562 | 0.999 |
typePublic | -13.226 | 3.153 | -4.195 | 0 | -19.466 | -6.986 |
Interpretation: We are 95% confident that for each additional 1,000 students enrolled, the institution’s expenditures on football will be greater by $562,000 to $999,000, on average, holding institution type constant.
Introduced statistical inference in the context of regression
Described the assumptions for regression
Connected the distribution of residuals and inferential procedures
Conducted inference on a single coefficient